As the controversial “emergency surveillance” bill being considered in the UK passed the House of Commons on Wednesday morning, privacy watchdogs criticized the law they say would allow the UK government to run an intrusive spying program on its citizens.
Retention and Investigatory Powers (DRIP) bill passed 449 to 33 and is
scheduled for a two-day final review by the House of Lords this week.
Commons voted following a contentious but inexplicably brief debate between MPs that included accusations of back-door deals, according to The Guardian.
Despite its quick approval, the bill has been slammed by technology
law experts, who warn that it would give the government too much power
to spy on UK citizens and that legislators have not been given enough
time for a thorough debate.
As Common Dreams reported
earlier, DRIP would require communications companies to store and track
the public's phone calls, text messages, and internet use and hand over
the data to the government, even without a warrant. Proponents have
said that there are enough safeguards in place to prevent the law from
becoming the kind of intrusive surveillance program that was struck down
by the European Court of Justice in April for violating the
“fundamental rights to respect for privacy.”
In an open letter
to the members of Parliament, 15 internet policy scholars from the UK
said the bill “goes far beyond” its intended use and that it “attempts
to extend the territorial reach of the British interception powers,
expanding the UK’s ability to mandate the interception of communications
content across the globe.”
Prime Minister David Cameron defended the bill’s quick progresshttps://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/07/16-2