re - Debunking the "The Saudis did 9-11" nonsense!

Debunking the "The Saudis did 9-11" nonsense!

And finally, here is some common sense that totally undermines the attempt to frame Saudi Arabia for 9-11. If Saudi Arabia really wanted to hurt the United States, they don't need to fly airplanes into skyscrapers to do it. All they have to do is ask for their money back, all at once. The resulting damage to the US financial system would make 9-11 look like a minor inconvenience in comparison.

And it would be perfectly legal for Saudi Arabia to ask for their money back.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

I am reposting this article because three pro-Israel congressmen are claiming that there is a secret 9-11 document that they are demanding to be made public, one that places the blame for 9-11 on Saudi Arabia. Walter Jones was on the Ron Paul channel today pushing this latest attempt to protect Israel from the consequences of their actions.

This is actually a repeat of the same stunt they tried 2 years ago in which they tease the public with the story of a secret 9-11 document and try to get everyone to demand to see it. The document frames Saudi Arabia for 9-11, to protect Israel.

But as this article lays out, Saudi Arabia didn't have a motive to do 9-11, and if they wanted to hurt the US, they would not need airplanes into skyscrapers to do it.

Optional Banner: 

WRH Exclusive



Speaking Of "9-11 TRUTH" - Mr. Anthony Lawson's Latest


Speaking of "9-11 TRUTH", Mr. Anthony Lawson sent me his latest video on the subject this morning.

I have posted it here twice. Not only has it not made it to the WRH front page, but it keeps disappearing from the "Member Submitted News" section as well.

(link to video - approx. 9 minutes)

"Antony Lawson - The Legend of 911 — 13 Years On"

Curiouser and curiouser . . . ;-)




if it is a no planner point of view, it will get deleted here,... for it is the owners right to moderate to his own liking.


I Think There May Have Been A Misunderstanding . . .


1newsjunkie writes:

"if it is a no planner point of view, it will get deleted here,... for it is the owners right to moderate to his own liking."

I think there may have been a misunderstanding by the moderator on Mr. Anthony Lawson's latest 9-11 video.

I think "1newsjunkie" is correct in his observation that this may have hit the "no plane at the Pentagon" zero-tolerance switch by the moderator.

In my work with Mr. Anthony Lawson over the years, I have never seen him as a "no plane at the Pentagon" person in the least.

I guess the working hypothesis many of us in the 9-11 TRUTH Community are currently pursuing is more of a "Planes=Yes, but most likely NOT the planes we were told were used on 9-11."

For me, this is based largely on the research by Mr. Christopher Bollyn in identifying the Israeli controlled Airline "Chop Shop" operations such as "ATASCO USA", "Israeli Aircraft Industries" (IAI), "Bedek Aviation Company", "Commodore Aviation", etc. . .

. . . as well as the research by "Pilots for 9-11 Truth" who have basically provided the same "That is physically impossible" arguments in the vein of the research done by "Architects and Engineers for 9-11 TRUTH" on WTC-7 when it comes to the aerodynamics and physics (especially VMO, wingspan, and engine placement and trajectories, etc) of the known flight paths and structural limitations of the aircraft in question.

"Pilots For 9-11 Truth"

For me, it is always disappointing when ANYONE deletes anything I choose to share . . .

. . . and I consider it very disrespectful when this is done without courtesy of any explanation . . .

... especially when one is expected to pay for the "privilege" to post in the first place. ;-)


as much as I hate


the expression...BB, it is what it is.

Over the many years here I have suggested a member only area, where some basic rules are outlined.

It does suck to have your post deleted, especially when no reason given. But it is what it is. One could surmise it simply isn't a priority for our host, and leave it at that. We are here voluntarily, and the door remains open. I (tried to) quit this place a few times, with the last being a 7 month stretch away. Did anyone miss me? ha!

As far as the planes issue, I could give two fucks, there is so much evidence abound to prove the official story a lie with out the controversial aspects added IMO.




doesn't take rocket appliances

Think we can take a half a step back here? The impacted plug over this issue near absurd.

First off, I will never agree supporting this release akin to being one of them, a zio trash agent as our host emotionally implied  a month back.  It reminds me of our host reaction to Alex Jones words about those who fight the Jewish cancer in our lives. It doesn't feel to good to have your opinion outed as an enemy agent or hateful ignorance  .

Consider this, the congress critters may be implicating the Saudis, where as we truth seekers want more pieces of the puzzle. Further truths wont harm the critical thinker.

I suggest, the Saudi Intelligence involvement was at the hand of the mossad/cia and their role passive, acting as out right as double agents and / or other compartmentalized dupes.


recalling Adam K's DC march debates here on WRH


your words to me...

doth protest too much, methinks




remember the five dancing Saudi Arabians?!?

yeah, me neither..

— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..



Flashback BEX Alert - 2004 Fahrenheit Bush & Saudis Did 9/11


Flashback BEX Alert - 2004

Michael "My Agent Is Rahm Emanuel's Brother" Moore releases his "controversial" documentary:

"Fahrenheit Bush & Saudis Did 9/11 . . . but absolutely no Israelis played a part"

"Fahrenheit 9/11 - Michael Moore (2004)"

The disclaimer should have read:

"No Zionists were harmed . . . or mentioned in the making of this film . . .

. . . except for Paul 'Office of Special Plans' Wolfowitz because the thing with the comb was just too damn funny to pass up."

"Paul Wolfowitz Goes to Fashion Extremes in 'Fahrenheit 9/11'"

I was at one of those "Used DVD" stores last week. They had a special of "Buy 2 Get 2 Free". I picked up a copy of Director Michael Moore's 9/11 "misdirection" as one of my "freebies" . . .

. . . I thought it would make an interesting study. I hadn't watched it since it first came out in 2004 (Right after I had gotten "blacklisted" for trying to blow the whistle on the entire NSA/Telco/ISP/Manufacturer illegal electronic surveillance and data mining/profiling programs. . . but I still had my house & farm & marriage).

When I watched it last week, I definitely saw a VERY different film with "these eyes" than the one I saw in 2004.

Given the "kosher" nature of the 9-11 "False Flag" attacks, I wonder if the Zio-Plan from day 1 was to have "Osama bin Laden with al Qaeda" as the "Patsy of First Choice" . . .

. . . but keep the "Bush Family, Halliburton & The Saudis" as the "Back Up Patsies" in case the "Public Relations" Marketing campaign on the primary patsies didn't fly?

This 2004 Michael Moore hit-piece does more than enough to "seed" this "The Saudis Did 9-11" meme in the minds of the so-called "Liberal Progressive Left" . . .

. .. all those clever "Zealots for Tolerance" that will destroy you if you dare "question" either the official story of 9-11 . . . or "THE Holocaust(TM)" . . . or dare point out what is going on in Gaza right now.

Yet another "Palestinian Massacre" by the same Tribe that gave us those "Dancing Israelis" on 9-11.

Anyone ever get Misdirector Michael Moore to address the fact of the "Dancing Israelis" arrested on 9-11?. . . ;-)